JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 24, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Rafael Antonio Gomez Berdugo

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó al Tribunal Superior de Bogotá que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la tutela de la referencia, toda vez que esta Corte explicó que al ser remitido el expediente al citado Tribunal, éste debió asumir el conocimiento de la demanda, por cuanto el Fiscal General de la Nación es una autoridad pública del orden nacional.

Si el peticionario puso en funcionamiento la jurisdicción ordinaria, no podía el Tribunal Superior, argumentando que los hechos narrados eran de carácter puramente administrativo, remitir el asunto a otra jurisdicción, pues la competencia no está atribuida, para estos eventos, en virtud de los hechos sino de la naturaleza del demandado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Ordenar al Tribunal Superior de Bogota que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la tutela de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.